CHAPTER 5
The Additional Sorrows of Conception
When the Home Loses Its Holiness
“Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.”
— Colossians 3:21 (KJV)
“Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth.”
— Psalm 127:3–4 (KJV)
“Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”
— Proverbs 22:6 (KJV)
Chapter 4 called the Church to choose truth over image, protect people and make repentance visible. We now bring that responsibility into the lives of children. Before they understand a sermon about holiness, they experience the way adults speak, respond to failure and care for one another at home. The faith we profess becomes part of the world in which they learn to trust.
Genesis 3:16 speaks of sorrow in childbearing within a world disordered by sin. Alongside the suffering we cannot prevent, there are sorrows adults add through neglect, deception, cruelty or the refusal to seek help. These are the additional sorrows this chapter asks us to examine. The concern reaches from the care surrounding pregnancy to the home into which a child is welcomed and the relationships that shape that child’s growing years.
The question is searching: what are our children learning from the lives we lead? When immediate pleasure, convenience or public appearance repeatedly governs adult choices, a home can teach lessons very different from those spoken in church. Children may hear us praise truth while watching us protect a lie. They may hear that God is love while finding it difficult to feel safe in the house that bears His name.
We must ask this with humility. Anxiety, disability, developmental differences, illness and emotional distress have many causes. A child’s struggle does not prove hidden sin in the home, and hardship during pregnancy is not evidence of a mother’s spiritual failure. Families may face bereavement, poverty, domestic abuse, mental illness or circumstances beyond one person’s capacity to manage. Children in care and their birth families must be approached with the same care; their histories cannot be reduced to a judgement about parental indifference.
The familiar saying hurting people hurt people describes a danger, not a destiny. Adults who grew up beneath rage may repeat it; those who experienced abandonment may find closeness frightening. Some carry wounds they were never helped to name. Understanding that history can explain why change is difficult, but it cannot excuse abuse, betrayal or neglect. The wound an adult received must not become a burden a child is expected to bear.
The gospel gives wounded adults reason to hope and courage to take responsibility. In Christ, we can confess what we have repeated, seek appropriate help and learn to respond differently. Repentance may include counselling, treatment, practical support and sustained accountability. Healing often takes time, but we need not wait until every wound has healed before beginning to protect the next generation.
Compassion must therefore lead us towards action. Homes help form children’s understanding of love, authority, conflict, forgiveness and God. Parents cannot control every outcome, but they remain responsible for the example they provide and for seeking help when a household becomes unsafe. A holy home is one in which adults accept that responsibility and make room for children to speak truthfully.
There is sorrow we inherit and sorrow we must endure. There is also sorrow we must stop adding.
Care begins before a child can ask for it. The psalmist looks back upon life in the womb with wonder: “For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb” (Psalm 139:13). He responds, “I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made” (Psalm 139:14). These words call us to receive developing life with reverence and to care for the woman carrying it.
Calling the womb a temple is a pastoral image, rather than a description Scripture directly gives it. Paul describes the believer’s body as the temple of the Holy Ghost in a passage about belonging to God and glorifying Him with our bodies (1 Corinthians 6:19–20). Applied to pregnancy, that conviction encourages care and faithful stewardship; it offers no basis for claiming that a mother’s difficult emotions or medical condition spiritually contaminate her child. Consecration does not require a woman to maintain a perfect emotional atmosphere. A mother who is frightened, unwell or overwhelmed needs support, not an accusation that she has failed God.
A mother’s health, safety and wellbeing matter. Prayer belongs alongside appropriate antenatal care, and concerns about mental health deserve discussion with a midwife or doctor. A husband’s responsibility also begins long before he first holds the baby. His gentleness, fidelity and willingness to share burdens help his wife receive care and prepare the home for their child. Where a mother does not have a supportive partner, trustworthy relatives, friends, church members and professionals can help ensure she is not left to carry those burdens alone.
Conception should lead towards consecration: receiving life as a trust and responding with care.
Hannah’s story gives this conviction a voice. “For this child I prayed,” she told Eli, before dedicating Samuel to the Lord (1 Samuel 1:27–28). Mary, carrying Christ, sang, “My soul doth magnify the Lord” (Luke 1:46). Their circumstances and callings were distinct; neither story supplies a formula for pregnancy or guarantees an easy journey. Both invite us to recognise that a child’s life belongs within our worship and obedience from the beginning.
Holiness over happiness begins before the nursery is decorated. A child must never be made responsible for curing marital loneliness, fulfilling an adult’s ambitions or securing a relationship. Each child is a person bearing God’s image, entrusted to our care and ultimately belonging to Him. Receiving that person faithfully requires us to examine what we expect from parenthood as well as what we intend to give.
That responsibility continues as children grow. A home can offer little guidance about television, online content or the use of screens while expecting children to appear devout at church. Age-appropriate choices help children learn judgement, but choices need explanation, example and loving boundaries. When adults leave children to navigate harmful influences alone, freedom can become a way of avoiding the work of parenting.
Proverbs 22:6 says, “Train up a child in the way he should go.” The Hebrew verb ḥānak is used of training or dedicating.1 Read as wisdom for parenting, the proverb directs us towards deliberate formation and the lasting influence of early guidance. It must not be turned into a formula that guarantees every adult decision or a verdict against parents whose children depart from faith. Children grow into people who make choices of their own. Our responsibility is to teach faithfully without pretending that we can determine the whole course of another life.
Being brought up in church is not the same as being brought up in Christ.
A child taught only to perform at church may learn when to stand, what to say and how to impress adults. Formation in Christ reaches into daily life. Children learn to pray when they are afraid, tell the truth after failure and seek forgiveness when they have caused harm. The habits of worship gain meaning when grace and obedience can also be seen at home.
Repeated contradiction makes that connection difficult. Children may watch adults worship warmly on Sunday and wound one another on Monday. A father preaches tenderness but speaks harshly to their mother. A mother teaches forgiveness but uses silence to punish. The family insists that truth matters while demanding that harmful secrets remain hidden. A child may struggle to trust the teaching because the people teaching it seem unwilling to live it.
Children can recognise such contradictions before they possess theological language for hypocrisy. When the pattern persists, they may begin to understand Christianity as a performance expected by adults rather than a life shaped by Christ.
The answer begins with honest repentance, not an appearance of perfection. When a parent says, “I was wrong. I spoke to you harshly. Please forgive me,” faith becomes visible in an ordinary relationship. The apology must be followed by an effort to change; children should not be required to comfort the adult or offer immediate forgiveness. Authority under Christ includes the humility to acknowledge harm and the responsibility to repair it.
Scripture’s family histories deepen this examination. They show us the seriousness of neglect and favouritism, while also reminding us that a child’s choices cannot always be explained by the parent’s conduct. Public usefulness and faithful parenting must both be examined on their own terms.
Eli was a priest, yet his sons Hophni and Phinehas treated the offerings with contempt and committed sexual wrongdoing with women at the entrance of the tabernacle (1 Samuel 2:12–22). Eli rebuked them, but God’s judgement included the charge that “he restrained them not” (1 Samuel 3:13). The earlier accusation was equally searching: he had honoured his sons above God (1 Samuel 2:29). His words of disapproval did not discharge his responsibility to address serious misconduct. The desire to preserve family loyalty could not justify leaving others exposed to harm.
Samuel’s sons Joel and Abijah likewise “walked not in his ways,” but accepted bribes and perverted judgement (1 Samuel 8:1–3). Their conduct is clearly condemned, yet the passage does not accuse Samuel of the same failure attributed to Eli. We must respect that distinction. A parent’s faithfulness does not automatically become the child’s faithfulness, and ministry standing cannot be inherited merely by proximity. Their story warns against assuming either a child’s virtue or a parent’s guilt from the other person’s reputation.
David’s household reveals sorrow that anger alone did not resolve. Amnon raped Tamar, and David was furious; the narrative records no act of justice by him in response, while Tamar remained desolate in Absalom’s house (2 Samuel 13:14–22). Absalom later arranged Amnon’s killing. The account calls us to notice the person harmed, rather than speak only about the family’s reputation or the anger of its men. In another account, Adonijah’s father “had not displeased him at any time in saying, Why hast thou done so?” (1 Kings 1:6). Refusing to confront a child’s conduct can leave that child without the correction love requires.
Jacob’s favouritism towards Joseph offers a further warning. His other sons saw that Joseph was loved more, and hatred grew within the household (Genesis 37:3–4). Their later betrayal remained their own wrongdoing, but unequal favour had helped create the conditions in which resentment flourished. Children’s different ages and needs may require different kinds of care; that must never become a message that one child has greater worth. Loving each child attentively is very different from making siblings compete for affection.
These are distinct histories, not interchangeable examples of failed parenting. Their children remained responsible for their actions. Taken together, the accounts call us to examine the duties actually entrusted to us: correcting wrongdoing, protecting those harmed and refusing favouritism. A public calling does not excuse private neglect. Nor does an adult child’s failure permit us to invent a parental failure Scripture does not describe.
Paul writes, “Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged” (Colossians 3:21). The verb erethizō describes provoking or exasperating in this context; athymeō, rendered “discouraged”, speaks of becoming disheartened or losing heart.2 The warning concerns the effect of our treatment upon children. Correction can be necessary without becoming a pattern of irritation, contempt or impossible demands that drains their courage.
This command belongs within Paul’s wider call to put on compassion, kindness, humility, patience and love, allowing the word of Christ to dwell richly among His people (Colossians 3:12–17). Those qualities must enter our parenting. We cannot teach children that they belong under Christ’s authority while treating ourselves as exempt from His instruction.
Children can become discouraged when the warmth adults offer publicly is repeatedly denied to them at home. They may see ministry receive careful attention while their own questions are brushed aside. Rules that change with an adult’s mood create confusion: a child cannot learn dependable judgement when the same action is welcomed one day and punished the next. Consistency asks parents to examine their expectations and explain them.
Discouragement also grows when affection depends upon achievement, siblings are compared or a child’s weakness is met with contempt. A demand for apology becomes difficult to trust when the adult never admits fault. Discipline that humiliates may secure outward compliance while leaving the child afraid to tell the truth. We must ask whether our response is helping a child learn or merely satisfying our desire to prevail.
Ephesians 6:4 joins the warning against provocation with the command to bring children up “in the nurture and admonition of the Lord”. Discipline should therefore help a child understand conduct, accept appropriate consequences and learn a better way to act. It must never become physical or emotional cruelty, the discharge of adult rage or the use of Scripture to demand silence. Wise correction attends to a child’s age, understanding and particular needs. It leaves room for explanation and for a parent to recognise when wounded pride has distorted the response.
Provision also needs presence. A child may have clothes, activities and devices yet find no dependable opportunity to be heard. Parents can record every achievement while missing the fear beneath it. A full family calendar should still leave room for a child to say, “I am being bullied,” “I do not understand what is happening between you,” or “I am struggling with what you teach about God.” Listening patiently is part of caring faithfully.
Children’s own voices reinforce the need to listen. The Children’s Commissioner for England’s Big Ambition consultation received 253,000 responses from children or adults answering for them. A later analysis examined 115,153 written responses from young people aged ten to seventeen, together with eighteen-year-olds attending school or college. The report identified a wish to be heard, treated fairly, supported and safe, with opportunities for positive relationships.3 It concerned what government could do to improve children’s lives, rather than a study of Christian homes, but its findings invite us to ask how seriously we take those needs within our own families.
When children express anxiety, anger or alienation from church, we need to listen before defending ourselves. Their struggle may have causes beyond our parenting, and something at home may also be contributing. Understanding requires patient questions and, where needed, professional help. Dismissing their distress closes the very conversation that might reveal what they need.
A young person questioning faith may be wrestling with belief, painful experience or a distorted picture of Christ presented by adults. We should not assume we already know the reason. Honest questions deserve a patient response. Where hypocrisy or domination has obscured the gospel, adults must repent and seek to represent Christ more faithfully, rather than demand that the child overlook what happened.
The expression “broken home” needs similar care. It is often attached automatically to divorce, lone-parent families or children in care, as though household structure told the whole story. Yet a family that appears intact may be living beneath fear, abuse, deception or emotional abandonment. A home shaped by separation may offer greater safety and stability than the household a child left. We need to understand the relationships within a home before pronouncing judgement upon it.
Marriage and family continuity matter, and their loss can bring grief. A widow raising children, however, should never be treated as though her household were unholy. A parent protecting children from violence must not be shamed because the abusive partner is absent. Foster carers, kinship carers and adoptive parents may offer the first dependable care a child has known. Sometimes protection requires a child to leave the birth home. The holiness of our response is shown by the care we offer, not by our insistence that every family appear the same.
The experience of children in care deserves attention in its own right. In England, 81,770 children were looked after by local authorities at 31 March 2025, a rate of 67 per 10,000 children.4 The term “looked after” describes a legal and administrative care status; it does not describe a child’s character or worth.
The Department for Education records a primary need at the beginning of a child’s period of care. Categories include abuse or risk of neglect, inadequate parenting capacity, the absence of an available parent and acute family stress; illness or disability can also be relevant.5 These classifications record a service need, not a complete family history. Some children have endured serious harm. Others are unaccompanied asylum-seeking children or enter care during a crisis their family cannot safely manage alone. Care may be provided through parental agreement or a court order. A Christian response must begin by seeing the child and understanding the circumstances.
Care can bring protection while further changes still create difficulty. The Department for Education’s stability measures for children looked after at 31 March 2024 recorded three or more placements during the year for one in ten children. The corresponding school measure showed 8 per cent experiencing a mid-year school move, while 27 per cent had three or more social workers during the year.6 These changes can require children to become familiar with new adults, routines and places while already carrying loss. Stability deserves our attention after a child reaches safety as well as before.
Sibling separation can deepen that loss. In its 2023 report, the Children’s Commissioner for England estimated that 37 per cent of children in care who had a sibling, approximately 20,000 children, were separated from at least one sibling in placement. A care-experienced young person spoke of “rebuilding those relationships” in adulthood and said, “I shouldn’t have had to.”7 Safe sibling relationships can preserve shared memories and belonging. They deserve deliberate support, with arrangements guided by the children’s needs and safety.
Educational figures also point towards the need for support. In England in 2023/24, 59.5 per cent of pupils looked after continuously for at least twelve months at 31 March 2024 had identified special educational needs, compared with 18.1 per cent of pupils overall. At Key Stage 2, 34 per cent of pupils in that looked-after group met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined, compared with 61 per cent overall. The Department for Education notes that differing rates of special educational need account for some of the attainment gap.8 These comparisons describe groups; they cannot determine an individual child’s ability or establish what caused that child’s needs. They call for patient advocacy and appropriate educational help.
These figures concern particular years and groups in England. They must not become a shorthand explanation for all children in care, nor evidence that care itself caused their difficulties. Their pastoral force is to remind us how much dependable support can matter. Churches can honour a child’s dignity by keeping promises, respecting privacy and working with the carers and professionals responsible for that child. A history of hardship should never become material for gossip or an identifiable sermon illustration.
Parental imprisonment brings another kind of separation. A child may lose daily contact, financial support or the adult who managed familiar routines. The remaining caregiver can face practical pressure alongside grief, anger or shame. Children may struggle with complicated feelings towards the absent parent, including love and loyalty as well as hurt. They need permission to speak about those feelings without being expected to defend or condemn the parent.
Where a parent has committed an offence, the child must never be treated as though they committed it too. Children need truthful, age-appropriate explanations and dependable caregiving. Letters, calls or visits may support a relationship where contact is safe and in the child’s best interests; specialist services can help families assess and prepare for it. Where contact would expose a child to harm, appropriate boundaries remain necessary. The child’s wellbeing must guide the response.
Churches can support the caregiver with practical help and offer pastoral care without turning the family’s circumstances into gossip. They can help children remain connected to school and healthy activities, working alongside those already caring for them. Ministry to an imprisoned parent can also encourage repentance where wrongdoing has occurred and preparation for responsible relationships after release. Justice requires truth about an offence; mercy also attends to the innocent people living with its consequences.
Divorce and separation require the same attention to what children experience. Scripture presents marriage as a one-flesh union: “For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife” (Ephesians 5:31). Malachi rebukes treachery against the wife of one’s covenant and speaks of God’s desire for “a godly seed” (Malachi 2:14–15). Faithful covenant life can give children a dependable setting in which love, belonging and responsibility are learned. Those blessings arise from the way adults live within the covenant, not merely from maintaining its outward form.
When a marriage breaks down, children may face divided loyalties, interrupted routines, financial changes and anxiety about permanence. Some believe they caused the separation; others become messengers or feel responsible for protecting a parent. A child should never have to carry an adult’s case or decide which parent deserves love. Adults must attend to the child’s grief without asking that child to manage theirs.
Acknowledging this sorrow must not become condemnation of every divorced person. Separation may be necessary to protect children and a parent from violence, coercive control or continuing harm. Remaining under one roof does not establish faithfulness when the household is governed by terror. Safety can require distance, professional advice and legal intervention. The call to holiness must support protection rather than pressure a family to preserve appearances.
Where separation occurs, parents still have faithful choices to make. They can maintain dependable routines where possible, answer questions honestly and repeatedly reassure children that the separation is not their fault. Children must not be recruited as allies or subjected to contemptuous accounts of the other parent. At the same time, refusing contempt does not require concealing harmful conduct: children need truthful explanations and clear safety boundaries. Each adult can take responsibility for their own wrongdoing and seek appropriate help without asking the child to pronounce a verdict.
God’s grace meets families whose hopes have been painfully disrupted. It does not erase the need to face what happened, but it gives us courage to begin the patient work of care and repair. Whatever their living arrangements, children remain people to whom we owe truth, protection and dependable love.
Jesus gives our response its clearest direction. When the disciples tried to turn children away, He said, “Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:14). Elsewhere, He placed a child among the disciples as He taught them humility, then warned against causing one of the “little ones which believe in me” to stumble (Matthew 18:1–6). His warning includes the fearful image of a millstone hung about the offender’s neck. Those entrusted with power must take seriously the harm they can do to another person’s faith.
The verb skandalizō, translated “offend” in Matthew 18:6, can describe causing someone to stumble or leading them into sin.9 It means more here than upsetting another person’s preferences. Within Jesus’ teaching about humble believers, the warning confronts conduct that becomes an obstacle to faith and obedience. It gives particular urgency to our care for children who depend upon adults to represent Christ truthfully.
Our conduct can place such obstacles in their way. We teach confusion when holiness is demanded of children but repeatedly excused in adults. We make trust difficult when a child discloses harm and is told to protect the family’s reputation. A church that defends its image at the expense of a child’s safety contradicts the welcome Jesus gives. Protecting the child and addressing the wrongdoing must come before protecting the institution’s comfort.
Protecting children belongs within ministry. Suspected abuse must not be handled solely through private prayer, family meetings or pastoral counselling. Concerns require prompt action through appropriate safeguarding procedures and referral to the relevant statutory authorities under local requirements. An internal church process must never delay necessary protection or lawful reporting. Forgiveness does not cancel these responsibilities, and a profession of repentance does not make a child safe by itself.
Jesus’ welcome directs us to examine the obstacles we have placed in a child’s way. The question reaches beyond whether we brought children to church: did the life we shared with them help them recognise Christ’s love and truth? That examination must lead towards practical change.
Our examination need not end in despair. We cannot recover years already lost, but we can respond faithfully now. The sorrows adults have added can be named and confronted, and God’s grace can sustain the work of repentance and repair.
Psalm 101 gives that work a searching beginning: “I will walk within my house with a perfect heart” (Psalm 101:2). The psalm voices a resolve to live with integrity; it is not a claim that the speaker never fails. It directs our attention to the conduct our household knows. Are we patient only in public? Does family receive the care we offer elsewhere? Holiness becomes visible when the people closest to us experience the truth we profess.
That integrity also shapes what we allow into the home. “I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes,” the psalmist says (Psalm 101:3). Thoughtful boundaries around pornography, degrading content, social media and the time given to screens can help children learn discernment. Those boundaries need explanation and a credible adult example. A parent continually absorbed in a phone will struggle to teach a child why attention matters. The aim is a home where guidance can be trusted and questions can be asked without fear.
Daily choices should attend to the person a child is becoming. Alongside asking what will make a child happy today, we can ask what this decision teaches about patience, responsibility or care for others. Enjoyment, play and affection belong in a holy home. They need not be set against formation. Loving boundaries give children room to grow while helping them understand that every desire need not be immediately satisfied.
Repair requires more than a general request for forgiveness. Children need to hear a truthful acknowledgement of what happened: “I should not have shouted at you,” or “What happened between us was not your fault.” They also need to see adults seek help and change the conduct that caused harm. A child may need time before trust returns. The parent’s task is to become dependable, rather than demand that an apology close the matter.
Formation in Christ also grows through ordinary rhythms. Deuteronomy 6:6–7 places God’s words first in the adult’s heart, then directs parents to teach them diligently through the daily life of the household. We cannot pass on a devotion we consistently refuse to practise. Conversation at breakfast, prayer during disappointment and an honest response after a disagreement can give Scripture a place in the life children already know. Family worship need not become a performance or a long lecture. Gratitude, service and hospitality can help children see what faith does.
Joshua declared, “As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD” (Joshua 24:15). He spoke in the presence of competing loyalties and called the people to serve God sincerely. Applied to our households, his words invite us to examine what governs our choices. Serving the Lord must become visible in how we speak, guide children, address harm and care for those who need protection.
Parents cannot believe on their children’s behalf or compel a sincere response to Christ. “My house will serve the Lord” must therefore begin with the adults’ own allegiance and the life they cultivate. Guidance can remain clear while allowing honest questions and recognising another person’s conscience. A household’s devotion is most convincing when children encounter truth, tenderness and a willingness to repent within it.
Churches share this work. They can mentor parents, support marriages before crisis and provide practical help when a family’s capacity is stretched. Safeguarding teams need appropriate training, and pastoral care should recognise the effects of trauma and the limits of its own expertise. Kinship carers, foster carers and adoptive families need welcome and dependable support. Sometimes a church can help a family remain safely together; sometimes it must support a child whose safety requires different arrangements. Faithful care follows the child’s needs.
A sacred home is not defined by how impressive it looks. Its life gives children reason to expect that truth can be spoken, harm will be addressed and love will remain dependable. Christ is honoured there through ordinary faithfulness, especially when obedience costs adults their comfort or pride.
The responsibility entrusted to parents begins with receiving a child as a gift and continues through patient care. Psalm 127 describes children as a heritage from the Lord and compares them to arrows in a mighty man’s hand (Psalm 127:3–4). The psalm begins by declaring that building a house is vain without the Lord (Psalm 127:1). Our work matters, but it is not sustained by parental control or self-sufficiency. We must depend upon God as we undertake what He has entrusted to us.
The image of arrows speaks, in its setting, of the strength children can bring to a household. As an image for parenting, it also invites us to think about careful preparation and direction. An arrow is not prepared by accident, and a child needs patient guidance. Yet the comparison must never turn children into instruments of adult ambition. Our task is to help them grow towards responsible lives before God, with support suited to the person each child is becoming.
We cannot promise our children painless lives. We can refuse to hand them avoidable wounds as an inheritance. A pattern of secrecy can be confronted, violence stopped and favouritism acknowledged. The refusal to apologise can give way to honest repair. Where a child remains in danger, change must include protection and the involvement of those qualified to help. These are concrete acts through which repentance begins to interrupt what once seemed inevitable.
We cannot rewrite what children have experienced, but we can become willing to hear it without defending ourselves. Their anger may be painful to receive; it must not become another reason to silence them. We can seek help and honour the carers, teachers and other trustworthy adults who provide stability. No child is merely the product of a “broken home”. Every child is a person before God, deserving love and able to look towards a future larger than the sorrow already endured.
Being brought up in church is not the same as being brought up in Christ.
Let our children see the difference. The worksheet that follows invites us to listen, examine the life of our homes and identify a faithful next step. We need not promise everything at once. We must be ready to act on what we recognise, seek the help required and keep the promises we make.
Chapter 5 Worksheet
The Sacred Home Audit
If you are pregnant or planning a family, what atmosphere are you intentionally cultivating around the pregnancy—peace or provocation, prayer or neglect, mutual care or continuing conflict?
What support do the mother and father presently need?
Looking back, did your children encounter holiness or performance in the home?
Tick every statement that presently describes your home:
□ We attend church regularly
□ We pray together at home
□ We worship and give thanks at home
□ Our children see us read and apply Scripture
□ Our home has age-appropriate boundaries around television, phones and online content
□ Our children hear us apologise and forgive
□ Our children have a safe adult to speak with
□ We know and follow our church’s safeguarding procedures
Which area most needs to change?
Have I provoked or discouraged my children through:
□ Favouritism
□ Emotional or physical absence
□ Imprisonment or repeated involvement with the criminal justice system
□ Harshness
□ Inconsistency
□ Loving ministry more than family
□ Humiliation
□ Comparisons with siblings or other children
□ Rules without relationship
□ Endless choices without formation
□ Refusing to apologise
□ Other: __________________________________________
Write one way you may have discouraged them:
What truthful and age-appropriate apology or repair is needed?
Psalm 127:4 describes children as arrows. List each child or young person entrusted to your care and identify what support—not control—they need now.
Child
Present need
One faithful action this week
1
2
3
4
Matthew 18:6 warns against causing a child to stumble. Have I placed any of these obstacles before a child?
□ Hypocrisy
□ A double life
□ Cruel or inconsistent discipline
□ Sharing unholy entertainment
□ Speaking contemptuously about the other parent
□ Asking the child to keep an unsafe secret
□ Making the child responsible for adult emotions
□ Ignoring a disclosure of harm
□ Protecting family or church reputation above safety
□ Making happiness an idol
What is the next repentance or safeguarding step?
Is there a child in your family, church or community who is living with separation, kinship care, foster care, adoption or another major transition?
What could you offer without intruding upon their privacy?
□ A consistent relationship
□ Practical help for carers
□ Transport or meals
□ Prayer that does not turn their history into gossip
□ Support with school or activities
□ Respect for sibling relationships
□ Trauma-informed pastoral or professional referral
□ Another form of support: __________________________
If a parent is imprisoned, what practical, emotional or spiritual support does the child and remaining caregiver need?
Am I protecting the child’s privacy while still helping them receive appropriate support?
What promise can you make only if you are prepared to keep it?
My body belongs to God. My home is sacred. My children are a heritage, not accessories. They will not be brought up only in church, but in Christ.
I will not demand perfection from them while excusing hypocrisy in myself. I will listen, protect, form, apologise and seek help when help is needed.
The additional sorrows will stop with me wherever repentance, truth and courageous action can stop them. My children will be prepared as arrows, not treated as weapons and not abandoned to carry adult wounds.
I choose holiness over happiness at any cost, and I entrust my children and every care-experienced child to the God who sees them completely.
As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Father,
Forgive us for the sorrows we have added to our children. Forgive us where we chose what pleased us over what formed them, where we performed at church but wounded at home and where we demanded from children a holiness we would not practise ourselves.
Forgive fathers who loved public ministry more than covenant and family. Forgive mothers and fathers who offered endless choices but no formation, rules without relationship or provision without presence. Forgive us when we protected an image rather than a child.
Heal children from discouragement, anger, anxiety and confusion where our conduct contributed to their pain. Where suffering has other causes, give us humility not to blame but to listen, learn and seek appropriate help.
Remember children who cannot safely live with their birth parents. Give them stable and loving homes. Protect their relationships with safe siblings and family members. Strengthen foster carers, kinship carers, adoptive parents, social workers, teachers and every trustworthy adult who remains beside them. Let no child believe that entering care erased their dignity or future.
Remember also the children whose mothers or fathers are imprisoned. Protect them from shame, isolation and the consequences of crimes they did not commit. Strengthen the caregivers carrying new burdens. Bring genuine repentance and transformation to parents in prison, and give families wisdom about contact, boundaries, reconciliation and safety.
Where hurting people have hurt others, do not allow pain to become an excuse. Bring wounds into Your light. Lead adults towards repentance, counselling, accountability and healing so that inherited sorrow is not passed forward again.
Today we dedicate our homes and families again to You. Teach us to walk within our houses with integrity and to set no wicked thing before our eyes. Teach us to bring children up in Your nurture and admonition—not merely in church, but in Christ.
Let our homes become sacred again. Let our arrows be shaped with wisdom. Let our heritage be guarded without being controlled. Let truth become safe, repentance visible and love dependable.
Let the additional sorrows end with us.
In Jesus’ name,
Amen.
Notes and References
1. Ḥānak (חָנַךְ), Proverbs 22:6, is used of training a young person and elsewhere of dedicating a house or the temple (Deuteronomy 20:5; 1 Kings 8:63). See Brown, Driver and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. חָנַךְ. The chapter reads the proverb as wisdom commending intentional formation, rather than a mechanism guaranteeing every adult choice.
2. Colossians 3:21 uses erethizō (ἐρεθίζω), provoking or exasperating in this context, and athymeō (ἀθυμέω), becoming disheartened or losing heart. The related instruction in Ephesians 6:4 uses parorgizō (παροργίζω), provoking to anger. See Joseph Henry Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, s.vv. ἐρεθίζω, ἀθυμέω and παροργίζω; compare Danker, ed., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. Read Colossians 3:21 alongside the call to compassion, patience and love in Colossians 3:12–17.
3. Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Children’s Commissioner’s Office, The Big Ambition Analysis for the National Youth Strategy, 10 December 2025. The consultation ran from September 2023 to January 2024 and received 253,000 responses. The later analysis examined 115,153 written responses from children aged ten to seventeen and eighteen-year-olds attending school or college. It concerned proposed government action to improve children’s lives; its application to family care in this chapter is pastoral, rather than a finding about Christian parenting.
4. Department for Education, Children Looked After in England Including Adoptions: Reporting Year 2025, published 26 November 2025. At 31 March 2025, 81,770 children were looked after by English local authorities, a rate of 67 per 10,000 children.
5. The same Department for Education release explains that recorded primary needs include abuse or risk of neglect, chronically inadequate parenting capacity, absent parenting and acute family stress. The primary need is recorded at the beginning of the current period of care. The categories are hierarchical: where several needs are identified, the highest category in the list is reported. They are not complete biographies of children or families, nor judgements about every parent’s motives.
6. Department for Education, Stability Measures for Children Looked After in England: 2024, published 12 June 2025 and updated 22 January 2026. The figures concern children looked after at 31 March 2024 and the corresponding placement, school and social-worker cohorts: 10 per cent experienced three or more placements, 8 per cent a mid-year school move and 27 per cent three or more social workers. The publication is designated official statistics in development. The measures describe different kinds of change and should not be combined into one percentage.
7. Children’s Commissioner for England, Siblings in Care, 26 January 2023. The report estimated that 37 per cent of children in care with siblings—around 20,000 children—were separated from a sibling in placement and included testimony from care-experienced young people.
8. Department for Education, Outcomes for Children in Need, Including Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England: 2023 to 2024, updated 3 July 2025. The release also cautions that higher rates of special educational need account for some differences in measured attainment.
9. Skandalizō (σκανδαλίζω), Matthew 18:6, can describe causing someone to stumble or enticing them into sin. See Thayer, Greek-English Lexicon, s.v. σκανδαλίζω. Matthew 18:1–6 places a child among the disciples as Jesus teaches humility, then warns against causing one of the “little ones which believe in me” to stumble. The chapter applies that warning to adults’ responsibility towards children without reducing its reference only to physical age; compare Mark 9:42 and Luke 17:2.
Brown, Francis, S. R. Driver and Charles A. Briggs. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.
Charity Commission for England and Wales. Safeguarding and Protecting People for Charities and Trustees. Guidance applying to England and Wales. Accessed 4 October 2026.
Children’s Commissioner for England. Siblings in Care. 2023.
Danker, Frederick William, ed. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Children’s Commissioner’s Office. The Big Ambition Analysis for the National Youth Strategy. 2025.
Department for Education. Children Looked After in England Including Adoptions: Reporting Year 2025. 2025.
Department for Education. Outcomes for Children in Need, Including Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England: 2023 to 2024. 2025.
Department for Education. Stability Measures for Children Looked After in England: 2024. 2025. Updated 22 January 2026.
Harris, R. Laird, Gleason L. Archer Jr. and Bruce K. Waltke, eds. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. Chicago: Moody Press, 1980.
Local Government Association. Research and Background: Understanding Parental Imprisonment. Part of Parental Imprisonment: Supporting Children and Families. Accessed 4 October 2026.
NHS. Mental Health in Pregnancy. Reviewed 11 March 2026.
Thayer, Joseph Henry. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1889.
Genesis 3:16; Genesis 37:1–36; Deuteronomy 6:4–9; Joshua 24:14–15; 1 Samuel 1:1–28; 1 Samuel 2:12–36; 1 Samuel 3:11–14; 1 Samuel 8:1–5; 2 Samuel 13–15; 1 Kings 1:5–6; Psalm 101:2–3; Psalm 127:1–5; Psalm 139:13–18; Proverbs 22:6; Malachi 2:13–16; Matthew 18:1–10; Matthew 19:13–15; Luke 1:46–55; 1 Corinthians 6:19–20; Ephesians 5:21–33; Ephesians 6:1–4; Colossians 3:12–21.